But I did get a fair amount of Country Email List material, particularly on unions and heavy industry in the late 1920s and 1930s. What I was really looking for was to analyze and understand the processes of interaction between rank-and-file workers and Country Email List management. of the companies. And I was able to get it with those materials. At the same time, I discovered that I was interested in the question of upward social mobility. When I first worked on education around Lunacharsky, it became clear to me that the question of giving "preference to the Country Email List proletarians" figured very prominently and no one had a theoretical framework in which to place this question.
What the Soviets were saying was that Country Email List they were empowering the working class through the party. But what they were actually doing, and one that had some resonance with real workers, was offering upward mobility Country Email List opportunities to workers, but especially to their children. They gave them preference in admission to higher education, for example. I thought that it was a really interesting phenomenon and that it was worth studying it, and that it was feasible to do it despite the limitations of access to the archives. The Country Email List Soviets, of course, would have rejected the term "upward social mobility."
They did not recognize that Country Email List notion, and would surely not have been comfortable with that interpretation of "proletarian preference rules." However, they had their own approach which their historians called "the formation of the Country Email List Soviet intelligentsia ." Now, the "formation of the Soviet intelligentsia " means, among other things, the social advancement of people of worker and peasant origin. Therefore, under that heading of formation Country Email List of the Soviet intelligentsia I was able to get archival material on upward social mobility.